Dr. Oz slammed for suggesting it may ‘only cost us’ 2% to 3% of American lives to reopen schools

‘I tell you, schools are a very appetizing
opportunity. I just saw a nice piece in The
Lancet arguing the opening of schools
may
only cost us 2 to 3 percent, in terms of
 total
mortality.’
That was Dr. Mehmet Oz speaking to Sean Hannity of Fox News on Tuesday about how getting students back into schools could help America get its “mojo back.”
And now he’s getting on earful on social media from viewers who have interpreted Oprah Winfrey’s old pal as saying that up to 3% of children dying is an acceptable trade-off for reopening schools — although that isn’t exactly what he said.

DR OZ: "Schools are a very appetizing opportunity. I just saw a nice piece in The Lancet arguing the opening of schools may only cost us 2 to 3%, in terms of total mortality. Any, you know, any life is a life lost, but ... that might be a tradeoff some folks would consider." 😳


Dr. Oz just made the argument that we should reopen schools because *only* 2-3% of kids will die.


Everyone arguing that “only 2-3%” of children dying isn’t a big deal to get the Dow back on track needs to identify 1 or 2 kids that they are willing to offer up to death. Name them.


Imagine being such a heartless ghoul that you think losing *ONLY 2-3%* of children to coronavirus deaths is an acceptable number to sacrifice at the altar of the economy.

How much are YOUR kids worth, ?https://twitter.com/i/status/1250810107694395395/video/1 

This led “Only 2-3%,” “Dr. Oz” and “Lancet” to trend on Twitter TWTR, -3.49% :
The April 8 Lancet article he was referring to reported that, “Recent modeling studies of COVID-19 predict that school closures alone would prevent only 2-4% of deaths, much less than other social distancing interventions.” That’s overall public deaths, not children’s deaths — still a tragedy, of course, and translating to thousands of American lives lost. That includes parents and children, friends and family. At least 138,487 people have already died from the coronavirus worldwide, including more than 30,000 in the U.S.

I'm relieved to hear Dr. Oz was only discussing total US fatalities rising 2% to 3% if we reopen schools, rather than 2% to 3% of schoolkids dying—which could easily have been taken from his inarticulate comments. That said, it's still *thousands* of avoidable deaths pre-vaccine.

And while Oz conceded that, “any life is a life lost,” his remarks about the “trade-off” in reopening schools at the risk of exposing more people to the coronavirus still struck many as some pretty insensitive math. What’s more, the Lancet paper also concluded that while school closures alone may prevent 2% to 4% of deaths, “combinations of social distancing measures should be considered.”
‘But to get every child back into a school
where they’re safely being educated,
being
 fed and making the most out of their
lives with a theoretical risk on the backside,
that might be a trade-off some folks
would consider.’
Oz is part of a chorus calling for a reopening of the American economy as soon as possible, even as the government reported Thursday that another 5.25 million Americans applied for unemployment in the second week of April, bringing jobless claims to 22 million in the past month. The COVID-19 pandemic has erased almost all the 23 million jobs created since the Great Recession.
President Trump was preparing to announce guidelines for states to follow on reopening their economies on Thursday, after telling reporters on Wednesday that data “suggests that nationwide we have passed the peak on new cases.”
Dr. Oz eventually apologized Thursday on Twitter.

I’ve realized my comments on risks around opening schools have confused and upset people, which was never my intention. I misspoke.


Dr. Oz slammed for suggesting it may ‘only cost us’ 2% to 3% of American lives to reopen schools Dr. Oz slammed for suggesting it may ‘only cost us’ 2% to 3% of American lives to reopen schools Reviewed by Your Destination on April 17, 2020 Rating: 5

No comments

TOP-LEFT ADS