Chuck Schumer demands explanation from VA over $208,000 bulk order of 'risky' hydroxychloroquine and its use of the unproven drug on veterans infected with coronavirus

Chuck Schumer has demanded an explanation from the Department of Veterans Affairs over its use of the 'risky' and unproven hydroxychloroquine drug on veterans infected with coronavirus. 

The Senate's top Democrat on Sunday said the VA needs to furnish Congress with details of its recent $208,000 bulk order of the anti-malaria drug and whether the White House has pressured the department to use it.

'If vets are being given this risky drug, New York families - and all families - have a right to know what is going on and what’s intended for the future.' Schumer said.

President Donald Trump and VA Secretary Robert Wilkie have talked up the drug's abilities to combat COVID-19 without citing published evidence. 

Chuck Schumer said the VA needs to provide Congress more information about a recent bulk order for $208,000 worth of hydroxychloroquine

The VA recently said most of its recent bulk order for hydroxychloroquine was being used for approved uses, such as treating lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, but it didn't provide breakdowns

Schumer's request comes after a whistleblower complaint filed this past week by former Health and Human Services official Rick Bright alleged that the Trump administration, eager for a quick fix to the onslaught of the coronavirus, wanted to 'flood' hot spots in New York and New Jersey with the drug. 

Major veterans organizations have urged VA to explain under what circumstances VA doctors initiate discussion of hydroxychloroquine with veterans as a treatment option.

'There are concerns that they are using this drug when the medical evidence says it doesn't help and could hurt,' Schumer said in an interview with The Associated Press.

He said given the fact the malaria drug, despite being untested, had been repeatedly pushed publicly by Trump, VA Sec. Wilkie must address whether anyone at the department was pressured by the White House or the administration to use hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. 

Schumer said Wilkie also should answer questions about a recent analysis of VA hospital data that showed there were more deaths among patients given hydroxychloroquine versus standard care, including how much patients knew about the drug's risks before taking it.

In a statement Sunday, VA spokeswoman Christina Noel called it 'preposterous' for anyone to suggest that VA would make treatment decisions based on anything other than 'the best medical interests of patients.'

'VA only permits use of the drug after ensuring veterans and caretakers are aware of potential risks associated with it, as we do with any other drug or treatment,' she said.

Wilkie in recent weeks has denied that veterans were used as test subjects for the drug and that it was instead administered at government-run VA hospitals only when medically appropriate, with mutual consent between doctor and patient.

Still, Wilkie and the department have repeatedly declined to say how widely the drug was being used for COVID-19, including how many veterans were given the drug, and whether VA doctors were given guidance by VA headquarters on specific scenarios when it should be used.

In a weekly call with veterans' groups this past week, Wilkie continued to defend VA's use of hydroxychloroquine.

He dismissed the recent analysis of VA hospital data showing no benefits to patients, suggesting the poor outcomes were because the cases involved older, very sick veterans.

'Use of this medication for treatment of COVID-19 is considered "off label" - perfectly legal and not rare,' he wrote in an April 29 letter to veterans' groups.

The analysis of hospital data, done by independent researchers at two universities with VA approval, was not a rigorous experiment. Researchers analyzed medical records of 368 older male veterans hospitalized with confirmed coronavirus infection at VA medical centers who died or were discharged by April 11.

About 28% of veterans who were given hydroxychloroquine plus usual care died, versus 11% of those getting routine care alone.

The VA recently said most of its recent bulk order for hydroxychloroquine was being used for approved uses, such as treating lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, but it didn't provide breakdowns.

Wilkie in recent weeks took advocacy of the drug even further than Trump by claiming without evidence that it has been effective for young and middle-aged veterans in particular. In fact, there is no published evidence showing that.

Veterans are 'very concerned that we still do not have clarity on the VA's past and present use of hydroxychloroquine in treating veterans with COVID-19,' Jeremy Butler, chief executive officer of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, told the AP.

'Now that the federal government issued an emergency use authorization for remdesivir to treat COVID-19, we need answers to these questions as well as the VA's plans for administering, or not administering, remdesivir,' he said.

That action by the Food and Drug Administration came after preliminary results from a government-sponsored study showed that remdesivir shortened the time to recovery by 31%, or about four days on average, for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

In a tweet Sunday, former VA Secretary David Shulkin urged the department to immediately curtail use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.

'With studies showing no benefit, VA should restrict use exclusively to clinical trials,' he wrote. Shulkin was fired by Trump in March 2018, and Wilkie replaced him.

Schumer said his main concern is determining whether the VA had conducted any 'clandestine studies to determine whether hydroxychloroquine was effective without their permission.' He said there's also concern that the department won't address specifically where the drug was sent.

'These are people who risked their lives for us,' Schumer said. 'They should be treated only with the utmost dignity, respect and high standards of care.'

The drug has long been used to treat malaria and other ailments. A few, very small preliminary studies suggested it might help prevent the coronavirus from entering cells and possibly help patients clear the virus sooner.

But the FDA last month warned doctors against prescribing the drug for COVID-19 outside hospitals because of the risks of serious side effects and death.